🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.